#MediaMind: @POTUS45 Trump's 2020 #StateOfTheUnion address - The Great American #Comeback? or a #Manifesto of Lies (as @SpeakerPelosi said) | @RoryTDC @CopelandNetwork @GotQuestions @JoelOsteen @Discogs @Wikipedia

on
Subscribe FREE to be notified when I uncover more strength here.
A friend shared this video of 2020's State of the Union address (the speech starts at about "-5:17:35," if you want to jump ahead):

"President" Trump & his supporters would give it the title "The Great American Comeback" (to which "Late Show"-host Stephen Colbert replied, "But they were obviously wrong, as the speech contained nary a trace* of 'I know you are, but what am I?'").

But Speaker-of-the-House Nancy Pelosi–ripping-up her copy of the speech in full view of the entire Congress (the entire Nation! the entire World!)–told reporters afterward that it was "a Manifesto of Lies."

Which one is it? We'll discuss it below, but first

'Those words' (below-hyperlinked to the Facebook-video (in case I got the code wrong above))—they're built on an even-deeper source ... something crucial that firms the foundation upon which our lexicon stands ...

*'Nary a trace'? Who says 'nary a trace' these days?
The word “Comeback” (the Executive-Branch's Writers obviously meant "Recovery, Return to Former Position or Condition (after Retirement or Loss)," referring to the 'Great Again' that Trump promised ... the word also often means "Verbal |Retort" and is built with the words “Come” & "Back." 
The word “Manifesto” is built on ancient words that mean “|Plainly |Apprehensive, |Clear, |Apparent, Evident (Manifest)” (Obvious Facts, |Palpable Things, Proof, Public Declaration Explaining Past Actions and Announcing the Motive for Forth|coming Ones).

hmm ... I wonder if they might not include some of the text of that 'manifesto' in evidence
 against him in an upcoming trial ... 

Trump's hate for Pelosi sours the whole State of the Union 2020 address
Without doing any fact-checking, you can tell that Trump offers lots of people high praise for things the probably really-did do, pushing some publishers to chide Pelosi for casting such a negative light upon such a positive address.

But what I think Pelosi was critical-of is the way Trump took credit for so much of the good stuff—the way he accused a large fraction of the Legislature for 'attempting to turn American Healthcare into a Socialist economy' ...

She called it "a manifesto of lies," and I think of The Father of Lies. I think of 'the way Satan manifests his lies on humanity'—he told Eve 'the Forbidden Fruit won't kill you,' and–for all we know–he was right. But–though Adam & Eve were probably 'doomed to die (eventually, as is the nature of all living things)'–they didn't know it until their eyes were opened to The Knowledge of Good and Evil.

Satan promises lots of good things to his followers, and they get most of those good things ... but mostly 'by their own power,' though Satan (who also likes when people call him 'God') loves to take credit for those treasures—the reason why some Christians hate Prosperity Gospelers like Kenneth Copeland Ministries & Joel Osteen Ministries etc.
Then I think, 'Aren't politicians infamous liars?' ... Indeed; but their job never was "to tell us The Truth," it is 'to maintain peace among their citizens' ... And wouldn't you rather hear about a possible-leader's 'positive intentions for the future' than their 'negative expectations'?

Or–as Trump's book put it–"a little hyperbole never hurts."



Know anything else interesting about that? Comment!

Comments

Post a Comment

I appreciate your comment, and I'll probably approve it & publish it soon (give me about a week before you try to post it again when it doesn't publish immediately ... thanks)