@DeonCole reminds us of the #Catch22 of Marriage | #Catch

on
Subscribe FREE to be notified when I add strength to the foundations here.
We'll get to 'the marriage "catch-22"' later, but first ... "Catch-22" is built on an even-deeper source ... something crucial that firms the foundation upon which the our lexicon stands ...
The word “Catch-22” is from Joseph Heller's 1961 novel “Catch-22.”
The novel's Catch (a word that's also built on "to Grasp" (Chase, |Hunt, Fasten, Touch, |Light, Kindle, |Set on Fire, |Apprehend, Understand, |Draw the |Attention, Trap, Device to |Hold the |Latch of a |Door, Fishing |Vessel)) was a Psychological Paradox: if you |Wanted to |Fly |Airplanes in the War, you were too |Crazy to be Allowed to fly; but then you were only Sane |Enough to fly in the war if you Asked Not-to (and then you would Have-to fly).
And the number "22" was only chosen for 'the |Euphony'—the original Catch-number was "18," but Heller & his publishers changed it so as not to get it mixed up with Mila 18 (published earlier that year).
Deon Cole explains–among other things (in the NETFLIX-special offered through some of the links above)–that many women meet- and marry men who then don't support them in rising to the next level in their lives.

But the other side of that is that some men (at-least myself) can't rise to a new level in life without a wife to support- and rise with-him. Maybe Deon Cole knows that, maybe not ... sources can't tell whether he's married, but he's very proud of his son Dylan.




Or maybe I'm looking at this
 wrong—that's one reason
 Our Father God said "It is
 not good for the man to be
 alone":  "Because the man'll
 think he's right until someone
 else shows him why he's not"
—Won't you show me if I'm right-or-wrong in
 the comments below?

Comments

Post a Comment

I appreciate your comment, and I'll probably approve it & publish it soon (give me about a week before you try to post it again when it doesn't publish immediately ... thanks)